The decision to upgrade machining centers needs to take into account factors such as equipment performance, production demand, technology iteration, and cost-effectiveness. The following key scenarios and indicators will help enterprises accurately determine the timing for upgrading: 1. A Decline In
A machining center is a numerical control (CNC) machine tool that is highly automatic and can do many things. Many people think of it as the most important piece of modern production equipment. It can do many precise machining tasks at once, like milling, drilling, boring, tapping, and so on. This
At Taiz, we design and build each machine from the ground up. This includes every motor, drive, encoder, spindle, and even the control platform. It’s no wonder we offer proprietary technologies that boost the efficiency of every machine. Our advancements, from CNC controls to operator productivity t
Views: 0 Author: Site Editor Publish Time: 2025-06-12 Origin: Site
The decision to upgrade machining centers needs to take into account factors such as equipment performance, production demand, technology iteration, and cost-effectiveness. The following key scenarios and indicators will help enterprises accurately determine the timing for upgrading:
1. A Decline In Equipment Performance Negatively Affects Production Quality
a. Continuous decline in machining accuracy
• Performance: Parts' dimensional tolerances are too poor (e.g., ±0.01 mm accuracy down to ±0.05 mm), surface roughness deteriorates (Ra value rises from 1.6 μm to 3.2 μm), and ripples or vibrations appear in contour machining.
• Cause: Wear of spindle bearings, increased ball screw clearance, poor guideway lubrication, or deformation of the mechanical structure.
• Need for upgrading: Insufficient precision leads to increased scrap rates, especially in high-precision fields such as aerospace and medical equipment, and it requires immediate evaluation and upgrading.
b. Significant reduction in machining efficiency
• Manifestation: Maximum spindle speed decreases (e.g., from 12,000 rpm to 8,000 rpm), rapid traverse speed slows down (X-axis decreases from 30 m/min to 20 m/min), and tool change time extends (from 3 seconds to more than 5 seconds).
• Cause: aging servo motors, insufficient processing speed of the control system, and wear and tear of mechanical transmission parts.
• Impact of upgrades: Lower efficiency leads to longer lead times, and upgrades are more cost-effective when there is a capacity gap of more than 20%.
c. Failure Frequency Surge, Maintenance Costs Exceed Limits
• Performance issues include monthly unplanned downtime exceeding 20 hours and annual maintenance costs surpassing 30% of the equipment's original value; for example, if the original value is 500,000 yuan, then maintenance costs would exceed 150,000 yuan.
• Typical problems include failures of the CNC system motherboard, alarms from the servo drive, and the need to replace mechanical parts frequently, such as replacing screws more than twice a year.
• Decision-making suggestions: If the maintenance cost for two consecutive years exceeds the residual value of the equipment (original value × 30%), it is more economical to upgrade to new equipment.
2. Increased Production Requirements That Cannot Be Met By Existing Equipment
a. Increased product complexity, multi-axis/composite machining required
• Scenario: shift from 3-axis machining to 5-axis simultaneous machining (e.g., impeller, mold surface machining), or the need to integrate turning and milling functions (e.g., aerospace parts can be turned and milled in one setup).
• Limitations: The old machine does not have a C-axis/rotary table, or the tool magazine capacity is insufficient (e.g., the original 24 tools cannot meet the demand of multi-processing of complex parts).
• Example: When machining complex parting surfaces in an automotive mold factory, the 3-axis machine needed to be clamped multiple times, but after upgrading to a 5-axis machine, the efficiency was increased by 3 times.
b. Production capacity expansion or frequent model changeover.
• Scenario: Mass production is shifted to small quantities and multiple varieties (e.g., from 100,000 pieces per year for a single product to 10,000 pieces/varieties per year for 10 products).
• Defects of the old equipment: long debugging time for model changeover (e.g., 4 hours for each model changeover) and downtime due to the lack of a pallet exchange system.
• Solution: By upgrading to a two-station pallet-changing machining center (e.g., Haas VF-6/50), the changeover time could be reduced to less than 1 hour.
3.Technology iteration and industry standards upgrade
a. Outdated CNC system, facing production elimination
• Risk: The old system (such as Mitsubishi M64 and Fanuc 16i) manufacturers stop technical support, and spare parts are scarce (such as the motherboard maintenance cycle of more than 3 months).
• Upgrade value: the new system's computing speed increased by 50%, supporting AI adaptive machining (such as automatic optimization of cutting parameters).
b. Compulsory updates to environmental protection and safety standards
• Regulatory requirements: EU CE certification requires equipment with an emergency stop response time ≤ 0.5 seconds and noise ≤ 85 dB.
• The problems associated with old equipment include hydraulic system oil leakage, excessive cutting fluid mist emissions that exceed the standard, and failures in the protection door interlock.
• Compliance costs: If the cost of remodeling exceeds 20% of the price of new equipment, it is more reasonable to upgrade directly.
c. Excessive energy consumption, not in line with energy-saving requirements
• Comparison: The old machine consumed 15 kW/h, while the new machine (e.g., Mazak INTEGREX i-400 AM) uses servo-efficient motors to reduce power consumption to 8 kW/h.
• Return on investment: Based on 16 hours of operation per day and an electricity price of 1 yuan/kW/h, the annual electricity cost saving is about 40,000 yuan, and the upgrade cost can be recovered in 3–4 years.
4. Strategic transformation and market competition drive
a. Entering the high-end market, the need to break through technical barriers
• Case: From consumer electronics parts to semiconductor equipment parts processing, the need for equipment to meet the ultra-precision machining (nanometer surface roughness) and constant temperature workshop compatibility (temperature fluctuations ± 0.5 ℃).
• Key indicators: upgraded to high-precision machining centers (e.g., GF Mikron HPM 800U) with positioning accuracy of ±0.005 mm and spindle thermal deformation of ≤0.01 mm/hour.
b. Responding to peer competition and improving delivery speeds
• Scenario: Competitors use high-speed machining centers (spindle 24,000 rpm), and the cycle time for the same type of parts is 30% shorter than ours.
• Upgrade strategy: Choose an electric spindle machining center (e.g., DMG DMG HSC 75 linear) with a high-speed cutting process to shorten cutting time by 20%-50%.